Skip to content
VuFind
Language
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Português
Português (Brasil)
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Türkçe
עברית
Gaeilge
Cymraeg
Ελληνικά
Català
Euskara
Русский
Čeština
Suomi
Svenska
polski
Dansk
slovenščina
اللغة العربية
বাংলা
Galego
Tiếng Việt
Hrvatski
हिंदी
All Fields
Title
Author
Subject
Call Number
ISBN/ISSN
Tag
Find
Advanced
United States of America et al...
Cite this
Text this
Email this
Print
Export Record
Export to RefWorks
Export to EndNoteWeb
Export to EndNote
Permanent link
United States of America et al., plaintiffs, vs. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., defendants
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors:
United States District Court (Missouri : Western District)
,
United States
(Plaintiff)
,
Union Pacific Railroad Company
(Defendant)
Format:
Kit
Language:
English
Published:
1939-1941
Subjects:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
>
Trials, litigation, etc
Railroads
>
Freight
>
Rates
>
Law and legislation
>
United States
United States
>
Trials, litigation, etc
Holdings
Description
Table of Contents
Similar Items
Staff View
Internet
Request
Stanford University
Holdings details from Stanford University
Call Number:
KF228 .U5 U5536 F
Similar Items
David C. Shepard vs. Northern Pacific Railway Company, and others, Emma B. Kennedy, and others, vs. Great Northern Railway Company, and others, and Henry A. James, vs. Great Northern Railway Company and others, consolidated, William Shillaber vs. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company, et al : master's report to the court
by: Otis, Charles E (Charles Edward), 1932-
Published: (2007)
Report of Geo. Bull, Esq., examiner, appointed March 28th, 1866, to take testimony in the cases of the Philadelphia & Erie R.R. Co., et al. vs. the Catawissa R.R. Co., et al. and Andrew Scott, vs. the Atlantic & Gt. West. R.W. Co., et al. : in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, nos. 28 and 40, January term, 1866
by: Bull, Geo (George), 1837 or 1838-
Published: (1866)
The county of San Mateo, plaintiff in error, vs. the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, defendent in error: argument of Roscoe Conkling, of counsel for defendant in error
by: Conkling, Roscoe, 1829-1888
Published: (2008)
The county of San Mateo, plaintiff in error, vs. the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, defendant in error: argument of S.W. Sanderson, Esq., counsel for defendant
by: Sanderson, S. W (Silas W.), 1824-1886
Published: (2008)
Decisions of Supreme Court of United States in matter of Edward T. Young, petitioner, and in case of Thomas F. Hunter, v. James H. Wood
by: Young, Edward T.
Published: (1908)
Loading...