Public Interest Litigation in India Overreaching Or Underachieving ? /
Public interest litigation has historically been an innovative judicial procedure for enhancing the social and economic rights of disadvantaged and marginalized groups in India. In recent years, however, a number of criticisms of public interest litigation have emerged, including concerns related to...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington, D.C. :
The World Bank,
2009
|
Series: | Policy research working papers
World Bank e-Library |
Subjects: |
LEADER | 03223nam a22005774a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ec6f8c0e-13ec-4933-9566-b6842bc3fcdb | ||
005 | 20230617000000.0 | ||
008 | 020129s2009 dcu i001 0 eng | ||
024 | 8 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-5109 | |
035 | |a (OCoLC-I)898252042 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC-M)778847015 | ||
040 | |a DJBF |c DJBF |d CSt |d UtOrBLW | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gauri, Varun |? UNAUTHORIZED | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Public Interest Litigation in India |h [electronic resource] : |b Overreaching Or Underachieving ? / |c Gauri, Varun |
260 | |a Washington, D.C. : |b The World Bank, |c 2009 | ||
300 | |a 1 online resource (25 p.) | ||
490 | 1 | |a World Bank e-Library | |
520 | 3 | |a Public interest litigation has historically been an innovative judicial procedure for enhancing the social and economic rights of disadvantaged and marginalized groups in India. In recent years, however, a number of criticisms of public interest litigation have emerged, including concerns related to separation of powers, judicial capacity, and inequality. These criticisms have tended to abstraction, and the sheer number of cases has complicated empirical assessments. This paper finds that public interest litigation cases constitute less than 1 percent of the overall case load. The paper argues that complaints related to concerns having to do with separation of powers are better understood as criticisms of the impact of judicial interventions on sector governance. On the issue of inequality, the analysis finds that win rates for fundamental rights claims are significantly higher when the claimant is from an advantaged social group than when he or she is from a marginalized group, which constitutes a social reversal, both from the original objective of public interest litigation and from the relative win rates in the 1980s | |
596 | |a 22 | ||
650 | 0 | |a Civil law | |
650 | 0 | |a Civil rights | |
650 | 0 | |a Corruption | |
650 | 0 | |a Courts | |
650 | 0 | |a Equality | |
650 | 0 | |a Human rights | |
650 | 0 | |a Judge-made law | |
650 | 0 | |a Judges | |
650 | 0 | |a Justice, Administration of | |
650 | 0 | |a Law and economic development | |
650 | 0 | |a Prisoners | |
650 | 0 | |a Rule of law | |
650 | 0 | |a Sexual harassment | |
650 | 0 | |a Social justice | |
650 | 0 | |a Will | |
650 | 4 | |a Access to justice | |
650 | 4 | |a Court | |
650 | 4 | |a Criminal | |
650 | 4 | |a Fundamental right | |
650 | 4 | |a Gender and Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Gender | |
650 | 4 | |a Information Security and Privacy | |
650 | 4 | |a Law Enforcement Systems | |
650 | 4 | |a Laws | |
650 | 4 | |a Legal Institutions of the Market Economy | |
650 | 4 | |a Social Development | |
700 | 1 | |a Gauri, Varun |? UNAUTHORIZED | |
776 | 1 | 8 | |a Print version: |i Gauri, Varun |t Public Interest Litigation in India. |d Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 2009 |
830 | 0 | |a Policy research working papers | |
830 | 0 | |a World Bank e-Library | |
999 | 1 | 0 | |i ec6f8c0e-13ec-4933-9566-b6842bc3fcdb |l a10711397 |s US-CST |m public_interest_litigation_in_indiaoverreaching_or_underachieving_____elect2009_______worlda________________________________________gauri__varun_______________________e |
999 | 1 | 1 | |l a10711397 |s ISIL:US-CST |t BKS |a SUL INTERNET |b 10711397-1001 |c INTERNET RESOURCE |d ASIS |x SUL |y 10711397-1001 |p UNLOANABLE |