Public Interest Litigation in India Overreaching Or Underachieving ? /

Public interest litigation has historically been an innovative judicial procedure for enhancing the social and economic rights of disadvantaged and marginalized groups in India. In recent years, however, a number of criticisms of public interest litigation have emerged, including concerns related to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gauri, Varun
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. : The World Bank, 2009
Series:Policy research working papers
World Bank e-Library
Subjects:
LEADER 03223nam a22005774a 4500
001 ec6f8c0e-13ec-4933-9566-b6842bc3fcdb
005 20230617000000.0
008 020129s2009 dcu i001 0 eng
024 8 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-5109 
035 |a (OCoLC-I)898252042 
035 |a (OCoLC-M)778847015 
040 |a DJBF  |c DJBF  |d CSt  |d UtOrBLW 
100 1 |a Gauri, Varun  |? UNAUTHORIZED 
245 1 0 |a Public Interest Litigation in India  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Overreaching Or Underachieving ? /  |c Gauri, Varun 
260 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b The World Bank,  |c 2009 
300 |a 1 online resource (25 p.) 
490 1 |a World Bank e-Library 
520 3 |a Public interest litigation has historically been an innovative judicial procedure for enhancing the social and economic rights of disadvantaged and marginalized groups in India. In recent years, however, a number of criticisms of public interest litigation have emerged, including concerns related to separation of powers, judicial capacity, and inequality. These criticisms have tended to abstraction, and the sheer number of cases has complicated empirical assessments. This paper finds that public interest litigation cases constitute less than 1 percent of the overall case load. The paper argues that complaints related to concerns having to do with separation of powers are better understood as criticisms of the impact of judicial interventions on sector governance. On the issue of inequality, the analysis finds that win rates for fundamental rights claims are significantly higher when the claimant is from an advantaged social group than when he or she is from a marginalized group, which constitutes a social reversal, both from the original objective of public interest litigation and from the relative win rates in the 1980s 
596 |a 22 
650 0 |a Civil law 
650 0 |a Civil rights 
650 0 |a Corruption 
650 0 |a Courts 
650 0 |a Equality 
650 0 |a Human rights 
650 0 |a Judge-made law 
650 0 |a Judges 
650 0 |a Justice, Administration of 
650 0 |a Law and economic development 
650 0 |a Prisoners 
650 0 |a Rule of law 
650 0 |a Sexual harassment 
650 0 |a Social justice 
650 0 |a Will 
650 4 |a Access to justice 
650 4 |a Court 
650 4 |a Criminal 
650 4 |a Fundamental right 
650 4 |a Gender and Law 
650 4 |a Gender 
650 4 |a Information Security and Privacy 
650 4 |a Law Enforcement Systems 
650 4 |a Laws 
650 4 |a Legal Institutions of the Market Economy 
650 4 |a Social Development 
700 1 |a Gauri, Varun  |? UNAUTHORIZED 
776 1 8 |a Print version:  |i Gauri, Varun  |t Public Interest Litigation in India.   |d Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 2009 
830 0 |a Policy research working papers 
830 0 |a World Bank e-Library 
999 1 0 |i ec6f8c0e-13ec-4933-9566-b6842bc3fcdb  |l a10711397  |s US-CST  |m public_interest_litigation_in_indiaoverreaching_or_underachieving_____elect2009_______worlda________________________________________gauri__varun_______________________e 
999 1 1 |l a10711397  |s ISIL:US-CST  |t BKS  |a SUL INTERNET  |b 10711397-1001  |c INTERNET RESOURCE  |d ASIS  |x SUL  |y 10711397-1001  |p UNLOANABLE