Coercive Consensus: Jewish Federations, Ethnic Representation, and the Roots of American Pro-Israel Politics /

Scholars tend to identify the 1960s and early 1970s as a period of pro-Israel ideological consensus in the American Jewish community. That consensus began to break down following the Yom Kippur War of 1973, slowly giving way to a more conflictual intra-Jewish debate over Israel. Yet apart from refer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Berkman, Matthew (Author)
Format: Thesis Book
Language:English
Published: [Philadelphia, Pennsylvania] : Ann Arbor : University of Pennsylvania ; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018
Subjects:
LEADER 04861nam a22005413i 4500
001 2be83f33-437e-44b6-80d1-d569849e7028
005 20230617000000.0
008 190904s2018 pau|||||obm |||| ||eng d
020 |a 9780438767805 
035 |a AAI10978815 
035 |a DISSAAI10978815 
035 |a DISSupenngdas:13511 
040 |a MiAaPQD  |b eng  |e rda  |c MiAaPQD 
100 1 |a Berkman, Matthew,  |e author 
245 1 0 |a Coercive Consensus: Jewish Federations, Ethnic Representation, and the Roots of American Pro-Israel Politics /  |c Matthew Berkman 
264 1 |a [Philadelphia, Pennsylvania] :  |b University of Pennsylvania ;  |a Ann Arbor :  |b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 online resource (474 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |2 rdaft 
500 |a Advisors: Lustick, Ian S.; Committee members: Adolph Reed; Rogers Smith; Beth Wenger 
500 |a Department: Political Science 
500 |a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis 
500 |a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: A 
502 |b Ph.D  |c University of Pennsylvania  |d 2018. 
506 |a Restricted for use by site license 
506 |a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses 
506 |a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors 
520 |a Scholars tend to identify the 1960s and early 1970s as a period of pro-Israel ideological consensus in the American Jewish community. That consensus began to break down following the Yom Kippur War of 1973, slowly giving way to a more conflictual intra-Jewish debate over Israel. Yet apart from references to the emotional impact of the Six-Day War of 1967, the literature on American Jews and Israel offers no explanation for the onset of the so-called "consensus" period. This dissertation asks: how did a total identification with Israel come to characterize every major national Jewish organizations during that brief but highly consequential period? The development of a national system of Jewish philanthropic federations, I argue, was central to the institution-building and network-formation processes that underwrote the post-1967 "consensus." First established at the turn of the twentieth century to streamline the raising and distribution of funds for Jewish charitable organizations at the municipal level, federations gradually assumed responsibility for a range of local communal functions, including political representation. Conceptualizing American Jewish politics on the model of a Bourdieusian "field," my dissertation explores the consequences of the federation as an institutional form for the distribution of economic resources, and thus power relations, in what I call the "American Jewish ethnopolitical field." Wielding their monopoly control over Jewish philanthropic resources, federations imposed discipline on the national Jewish political organizations, forcing ideological adversaries to coordinate their public affairs activities under federation auspices. By the Six-Day War, this process had yielded a nationally centralized Jewish political framework-the National Community Relations Advisory Council (NCRAC)-capable of orchestrating mass mobilizations across the country and policing internal dissent through the coordinated application of economic and symbolic sanctions. The consolidation of pro-Israel identity at the level of national organizations was thus the effect of an institutional project constructed through the strategic deployment of economic coercion-a "coercive consensus." While existing accounts of American pro-Israel politics tend to foreground the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, I demonstrate the centrality of federations and their political auxiliaries to pro-Israel advocacy during much of the second half of the twentieth century 
530 |a Also available in print 
538 |a Mode of access: World Wide Web 
546 |a English 
590 |a School code: 0175 
650 4 |a American history 
650 4 |a Judaic studies 
650 4 |a Penn dissertations  |x Political science 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Penn dissertations 
650 4 |a Political science 
655 7 |a Academic theses  |2 fast 
655 7 |a Academic theses  |2 lcgft 
700 1 |a Lustick, Ian,  |d 1949-  |e degree supervisor 
710 2 |a University of Pennsylvania  |b Political Science,  |e degree granting institution. 
773 0 |t Dissertations Abstracts International  |g 80-07A 
790 |a 0175 
791 |a Ph.D 
792 |a 2018 
999 1 0 |i 2be83f33-437e-44b6-80d1-d569849e7028  |l 9977579938803681  |s US-PU  |m coercive_consensus_jewish_federations_ethnic_representation_and_the_ro_____2018_______univea________________________________________berkman__matthew___________________e